About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-410566.2 1 (2015-06-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadreo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          G   A     0Comptroller General
               ity * Integrity * Rellability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This version has been
                                                    approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Consummate Computer Consultants Systems, LLC

          File:       B-410566.2

          Date:       June 8, 2015

          Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq., Erin L. Felix, Esq., and Grace 0. Aduroja, Esq., Polsinelli
          PC, for the protester.
          Kasey Podzius, Esq., and Julie Cannatti, Esq., Department of Housing and Urban
          Development, for the agency.
          K. Nicole Willems, Esq., and Jennifer Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest of agency's technical evaluation in a lowest-price, technically-acceptable
          procurement is denied where the record demonstrates that the agency's evaluation
          was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation.
          DECISION

          Consummate Computer Consultants Systems, LLC (Consummate), a small
          business located in Washington, DC, protests the issuance of a task order to Cloud
          Nine Technologies, Inc. (Cloud Nine), of Herndon, VA, under request for quotations
          (RFQ) No. DU100F-14-R-0001, issued by the Department of Housing and Urban
          Development (HUD), for information technology (IT) services.1 Consummate
          challenges HUD's finding that its quote was technically unacceptable.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          1 While the cover page (SF 33) identified the solicitation as an RFP (i.e., request for
          proposals), and the document included multiple references to proposals and
          offerors, the agency reports that it was a request for quotations. In keeping with the
          agency's characterization, we refer to the solicitation as an RFQ in this decision.
          The distinction between an RFP and an RFQ has no bearing on our analysis of the
          issues presented.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most