About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-410246,B-410246.2 1 (2014-11-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqxu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          G    A     0Comptroller General
               ity * Integrity * Rellability                            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office         DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
                                                     L  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i
                Decision

          Matter of:   AIS Engineering, Inc.

          File:        B-410246; B-410246.2

          Date:        November 21, 2014

          Jonathan T. Williams, Esq., Alexander 0. Levine, Esq., and Kathryn V. Flood, Esq.,
          PilieroMazza PLLC, for the protester.
          John E. Jensen, Esq., Alexander B. Ginsberg, Esq., Travis L. Mullaney, Esq., and
          Meghan d. Doherty, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, for UltiSat, Inc., an
          intervenor.
          Ronald D. Sullivan, Esq., Vincent H. Buonocore, Esq., and Frank V. DiNicola, Esq.,
          Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
          Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Where solicitation required submission of both an unsanitized and a sanitized (with
          identifying information deleted) version of proposals, protest that agency should
          have rejected awardee's proposal for failing to submit unsanitized version at the time
          initial proposals were due is denied where awardee submitted a sanitized version
          which was, as anticipated by the agency, used for evaluation purposes, and
          submitted an unsanitized version with its final proposal revision.
          DECISION

          AIS Engineering, Inc., of Silver Spring, Maryland, protests the Department of
          Veterans Affairs' (VA) decision to issue a task order to UltiSat, Inc., of Gaithersburg,
          Maryland, under request for proposals (RFP) No. VA 18A-1 4-R-0092, for support
          services for VA satellite communication infrastructure. AIS asserts that UltiSat failed
          to submit a complete proposal, and that the agency failed to consider whether
          UltiSat's proposed price was unbalanced.

          We deny the protest.

          The solicitation provided for the issuance of a task order, under a General Services
          Administration (GSA) Custom SATCOM Solutions small business indefinite-
          delivery/indefinite-quantity, multiple-award contract, to operate and maintain the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most