About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-410485,B-410485.2,B-410485.3 1 (2015-01-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqwo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O Comptroller General Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. D e c i s i o n L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . .. Matter of: Sierra Nevada Corporation File: B-410485; B-410485.2; B-410485.3 Date: January 5, 2015 Neil H. O'Donnell, Esq., Patricia A. Meagher, Esq., Dennis J. Callahan, Esq., Jeffery M. Chiow, Esq., Lauren B. Kramer, Esq., Lucas T. Hanback, Esq., Katherine L. Pohl, Esq., and Robert S. Metzger, Esq., Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC, for the protester. Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Jon W. Burd, Esq., Samantha S. Lee, Esq., and Gary S. Ward, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, and Padraic B. Fennelly, Esq., Suzette W. Derrevere, Esq., and Stephen J. Cowen, Esq., The Boeing Company, for The Boeing Company; and Richard J. Vacura, Esq., Pablo A. Nichols, Esq., Steven W. Cave, Esq., Catherine L. Chapple, Esq., and Keric B. Chin, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for Space Exploration Technologies, the intervenors. Karen M. Reilley, Esq., Alexander T. Bakos, Esq., Brian M. Stanford, Esq., Steven G. Horn, Esq., James T. Mahoney, Esq., and Bradley W. Smith, Esq., National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for the agency. Eric M. Ransom, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that the agency improperly elevated the importance of a solicitation goal to a de facto requirement is denied where the evaluation was consistent with the stated criteria. 2. Protest challenging the agency's determination that the awardee's fixed price was realistic is denied where the agency reasonably considered various factors supporting the awardee's low price. 3. Protest of the agency's technical evaluation is denied where the evaluation was reasonable, consistent with the stated criteria, and not unequal. 4. Protest of the agency's past performance evaluation is denied where the agency conducted a reasonable evaluation of the offeror's past performance references, and gave effect to all elements of the evaluation set forth in the RFP.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most