About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-410329,B-410329.2,B-410329.3 1 (2014-12-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqvv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
         D e  c i s i o n                          L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   Lockheed Martin Corporation

         File:        B-410329; B-410329.2; B-410329.3

         Date:        December 11, 2014

         Michael F. Mason, Esq., Brendan M. Lill, Esq., and Katherine L. Morga, Esq.,
         Hogan Lovells US LLP, for the protester.
         Lorraine C. Lee, Esq., Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, for the agency.
         Kevin P. Connelly, Esq., Kelly E. Buroker, Esq., Kirsten W. Konar, Esq., and
         Caroline A. Keller, Esq., Vedder Price, for Exelis Systems Corporation, an
         intervenor.
         Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Agency reasonably evaluated protester's technical approach as reflecting a
         significant weakness where protester's solution relied on upgrades to an information
         technology tool which would not be completely available for a significant period of
         time after contract award.

         2. Agency performed a reasonable price/cost evaluation where it considered
         various elements of each offeror's proposal and concluded that awardee's proposal
         of substantially more, albeit less senior, personnel was reasonable, realistic, and
         represented the lowest risk.

         3. Acceptability of an offeror's cost accounting system is a matter of responsibility,
         and the agency's post-source-selection dialogue with the awardee regarding the
         status of its accounting system did not constitute discussions.
         DECISION

         Lockheed Martin Corporation, of Gaithersburg, Maryland, protests the Department
         of the Army, Corps of Engineers' award of a contract to Exelis Systems Corporation,
         of Colorado Springs, Colorado, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No.
         W91WMC-13-R-0002 to provide information management/information technology
         (IM/IT) services. Lockheed protests that the agency misevaluated its proposal
         under the technical/business management factor; failed to perform a reasonable

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most