About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-409996 1 (2014-10-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqqb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




 G             A   O                                                  Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of:  Korea Resources Environment Company, Ltd.

          File:       B-409996

          Date:       October 3, 2014

          Sunbong Choi for the protester.
          Jamal A. Rhinehardt, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Evaluation of protester's proposal is unobjectionable where record shows that the
          agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with solicitation's evaluation
          criteria as well as applicable statutes and regulations.
          DECISION

          Korea Resources Environment Company, Ltd. (Korea Resources) of Suwon,
          Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea, protests the award of a contract to Pyungtaek
          Environment Company, Ltd. (Pyungtaek) of Pyeongtaek City, Gyeonggi-Do, South
          Korea, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91 QVN-1 4-R-01 04 issued by the
          Department of the Army, 411th Contracting Support Brigade, for solid waste
          management services at Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. Korea
          Resources argues that the agency unreasonably rejected its proposal as
          unacceptable.

          We deny the protest.

          Issued on April 10, 2014, and amended several times, the solicitation contemplated
          the award of a fixed-price contract to provide solid waste collection and other
          integrated waste management services for a base period of performance, plus four
          1-year options. Award was to be made using a lowest-price technically acceptable
          selection process. RFP at 74. For the purpose of determining technical
          acceptability, the RFP established three evaluation factors: (1) technical;
          (2) management; and (3) past performance. Id. at 76-78. As it relates to the
          protest, the technical factor was comprised of two subfactors, prior experience and
          business registration. The management factor was also comprised of two

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most