About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-409873 1 (2014-09-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqnv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A    O                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: SST Supply and Service Team GmbH

         File:       B-409873

         Date:       September 2, 2014

         Paul D. Reinsdorf, Esq., for the protester.
         Michael Truppel, Optronic GmbH & Co., KG, for the intervenor.
         CPT Vera A. Strebel, Department of the Army, for the agency.
         Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest that agency misevaluated awardee's proposal and past performance is
         denied where record shows that agency's evaluation was reasonable and
         consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable statutes and regulations.
         DECISION

         SST Supply and Service Team GmbH, of Krailing, Germany, protests the award of
         a contract to Optronic GmbH & Co., KG, of Konigsbronn, Germany, under request
         for proposals (RFP) No. W912PB-14-R-3003, issued by the Department of the Army
         to acquire civilians on the battlefield role-player services for military exercises to be
         conducted at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center in Hohenfels, Germany.
         SST maintains that the agency misevaluated the Optronic proposal.

         We deny the protest.

         BACKGROUND

         The RFP contemplates the award of a fixed-price requirements-type contract for a
         base year and up to two 1-year option periods to provide qualified personnel to
         perform the required role-player services. Firms were advised that award would be
         made on a low-priced, technically acceptable (LPTA) basis. The RFP included two
         non-price evaluation factors, technical and past performance. RFP at 10-11. The
         technical factor included four subfactors, and advised that proposals had to be
         assigned an acceptable rating under each subfactor to be considered for award. Id.
         As relevant here, the fourth subfactor was experience. Id. Under that subfactor, the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most