About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-409148.3,B-409148.4 1 (2014-07-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqln0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O Comptroller General r Accountablity * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 Decision Matter of: Harris Corporation File: B-409148.3; B-409148.4 Date: July 30, 2014 Lori Ann Lange, Esq., and Nick R. Hoogstraten, Esq., Peckar & Abramson, PC, for the protester. Mark D. Colley, Esq., Dominique L. Casimir, Esq., and Emma V. Broomfield, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, for the intervenor. Debra J. Talley, Esq., U.S. Army Materiel Command, for the agency. Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Where Government Accountability Office (GAO) sustained protest on grounds that awardee did not meet a material solicitation requirement, and agency implements corrective action that results in awardee's proposal being found unacceptable, GAO will not consider subsequent protest by awardee that original protester's proposal also should have been found unacceptable, where the challenge does not go beyond speculating about the contents of the original protester's proposal. DECISION Harris Corporation, of Lynchburg, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to Motorola Solutions, Inc., of Columbia, Maryland, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91CRB-13-R-0024, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Materiel Command, for a land mobile radio (LMR) system for the Detroit Arsenal, Michigan. Harris maintains that the terms of the RFP exceed the agency's requirements, and that the Army failed to engage in discussions with it and misevaluated proposals in making its award decision. We dismiss the protest. This is our second occasion to consider the Army's actions in connection with this acquisition. Motorola filed a previous protest challenging the agency's award of a contract to Harris, maintaining, among other things, that, because Harris did not propose a radio that was approved by the Michigan Public Safety Communication

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most