About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-409570.2 1 (2014-06-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqkb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          G    A     0Comptroller General
               ity * Integrity * Rellability                            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Acquisition Services Corporation

          File:        B-409570.2

          Date:        June 18, 2014

          Ira E. Hoffman, Esq., and Edward J. Tolchin, Esq., Offit Kurman, P.A., for the
          protester.
          William A. Roberts, III, Esq., John R. Prairie, Esq., and Stacie L. Gonsalves, Esq.,
          Wiley Rein LLP, for the intervenor.
          Kyle E. Chadwick, Esq., and Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          K. Nicole Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of awardee's proposal is denied where
          the selection authority had a reasonable understanding of the proposal, and the
          evaluation findings were reasonable and consistent with the evaluation criteria.

          2. Protest that agency failed to properly conduct a cost realism analysis is denied
          where the agency reasonably evaluated awardee's proposal and determined that an
          upward adjustment should be made to the probable cost, based on the possibility
          that certain cost saving efficiencies might not be realized, but that no downgrade of
          technical scores was necessary where the awardee's technical approach and labor
          mix were realistic.

          3. A competitive advantage arising from the awardee's performance of a related
          task order did not give rise to an organizational conflict of interest where the
          advantage was attributable to the awardee's general knowledge of the agency's
          organization and every day operations, gained through its performance of the related
          task order, and did not result from preferential treatment or unfair action by the
          agency.
          DECISION

          Acquisition Services Corporation, LLC (ASC), of Huntsville, Alabama, protests the
          issuance of a task order to Quantech Services, Inc. (Quantech), also of Huntsville,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most