About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-408182.5 1 (2014-01-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqac0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A    O                                                  Comptroller General
Acc      nabi t *inegity ReI!bity                                      of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
  Washington, DC 20548                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
           D e c i s i o n                          L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


           Matter of:  Sea Box, Inc.

           File:       B-408182.5

           Date:       January 10, 2014

           Pamela J. Mazza, Esq., Brian F. Wilbourn, Esq., Kathryn V. Flood, Esq., and Peter
           B. Ford, Esq., PilieroMazza PLLC, for the protester.
           David R. Johnson, Esq., Jamie F. Tabb, Esq., and Elizabeth A. Krabill, Esq., Vinson
           & Elkins LLP, for Technology and Supply Management, LLC, the intervenor.
           Wade L. Brown, Esq., and Denise M. Marrama, Esq., Department of the Army,
           for the agency.
           Heather Weiner, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
           GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Protest that the agency unreasonably evaluated the compliance of the awardee's
           proposal with a material solicitation requirement is denied where the record shows
           that the agency's evaluation of the awardee's proposal was reasonable and
           consistent with the solicitation terms.

           2. Protest that the agency unreasonably excluded the protester's proposal from the
           competitive range is denied where the agency reasonably determined that the
           protester's proposal did not address a solicitation requirement and was not among
           the most highly-rated offers.
           DECISION

           Sea Box, Inc., of East Riverton, New Jersey, protests the award of a contract to
           Technology and Supply Management, LLC (TaSM), of Fairfax, Virginia, under
           Request for Proposals (RFP) No. W15QKN-12-R-0070, issued by the U.S. Army,
           Army Contracting Command, New Jersey, for energy efficient shelters. Sea Box
           protests the Army's evaluation of its proposal as technically unacceptable, and
           exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range. The protester also challenges
           the agency's technical evaluation of Sea Box's and TaSM's proposals, as well as
           the size status of TaSM.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most