About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-408941 1 (2013-12-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpzr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
         D e  c i s i o n                          L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   Superlative Technologies, Inc.

         File:        B-408941

         Date:        December 30, 2013

         Kenneth D. Brody, Esq., and Thomas K. David, Esq., David, Brody & Dondershine,
         LLP, for the protester.
         Lee Dougherty, Esq., and Katherine A. Straw, Esq., Fluet Huber & Hoang PLLC, for
         Phacil, Inc., the intervenor.
         Major Donald Bugg, and Damon B. Richardson, Esq., Department of the Air Force,
         and Kenneth Roth, Esq., and Robert Bowers, Esq., United States Transportation
         Command, for the agency.
         Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest arguing that the awardee's quotation misrepresented the awardee's
         relationship with the protester's employee is denied where the record does not
         clearly reflect a misrepresentation, and the agency's evaluation in any event did not
         rely on the alleged misrepresentation.

         2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the awardee's technical quotation
         and past performance is denied where the evaluation was reasonable and in
         accordance with the solicitation's evaluation criteria, which did not require vendors
         to demonstrate specialized experience, as alleged by the protester.
         DECISION

         Superlative Technologies, Inc. (SuprTEK), of Ashburn, Virginia, protests the award
         of a task order to Phacil, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia, issued by the United States
         Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) under request for quotations (RFQ)
         No. HTC711-13-Q-D008 for support services and related project management for
         the Surface Deployment and Distribution Command's electronic transportation
         acquisition (ETA) authentication system. The protester, who is the incumbent
         contractor for this requirement, alleges that the agency relied on a material
         misrepresentation in evaluating the acceptability of the awardee's quotation, and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most