About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-408858,B-408858.2 1 (2013-12-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpxu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: SGAO Accountability * Integrity * Reliability United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 Decision Matter of: File: Date: Comptroller General of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. L ................................................................................................................. CACI Technologies, Inc. B-408858; B-408858.2 December 5, 2013 Daniel J. Donohue, Esq., Claude P. Goddard, Jr., Esq., Walter Wilson, Esq., and Steven J. Weber, Esq., Polsinelli PC, for the protester. Craig A. Holman, Esq., Kara L. Daniels, Esq., Emma V. Broomfield, Esq., and Steffen G. Jacobsen, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, for the intervenor. Major Brent A. Cotton, Max D. Houtz, Esq., and Gregory A. Moritz, Esq., Defense Intelligence Agency, for the agency. Robert T. Wu, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that awardee's proposal contained an impermissible bait and switch of its key personnel is denied where there is no evidence that the awardee made a material misrepresentation in its proposal with respect to its key personnel. 2. Protest challenging evaluation of awardee's technical proposal is denied where the record shows that the agency reasonably evaluated the proposal in accordance with the stated evaluation criteria. DECISION CACI Technologies, Inc., of Chantilly, Virginia, protests the award of a task order to Mission Essential Personnel (MEP), of Columbus, Ohio, by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) under task order request (TOR) No. HHM402-13-R-0064 for classification review and declassification support services under the agency's habeas corpus support contract. CACI argues that MEP materially misrepresented the key personnel that would perform on the task order, and that the agency improperly departed from the TOR's evaluation scheme in evaluating MEP's proposal. We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most