About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-408638 1 (2013-11-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpvx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A    O                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of:  Peridot Solutions, LLC

         File:       B-408638

         Date:       November 6, 2013

         Ranapratap Chegu, Peridot Solutions, LLC, for the protester.
         Devon E. Hewitt, Esq., Protorae Law PLLC, for Global Tech, Inc. d/b/a
         eGlobalTech, the intervenor.
         Todd E. Davis, Esq., and Brian M. Stanford, Esq., Department of Education, for
         the agency.
         Matthew T. Crosby, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest that agency conducted unequal discussions with protester and awardee
         regarding pricing is denied where record shows that agency found protester's initial
         pricing to be reasonable but found awardee's initial pricing to be unreasonably high.
         DECISION

         Peridot Solutions, LLC, of Tysons Corner, Virginia, protests the award of a contract
         to Global Tech, Inc. d/b/a eGlobalTech, of Arlington, Virginia, under request for
         proposals (RFP) No. ED-CIO-1 3-Q-0004 issued by the Department of Education for
         services in support of the agency's Information Technology Investment
         Management and Enterprise Architecture programs. Peridot asserts that the
         agency conducted discussions unequally with regard to pricing.

         We deny the protest.

         BACKGROUND

         The solicitation, which the agency issued on March 5, 2013, contemplated the
         award of a fixed-price contract with a base period of 8 months and four 1-year
         option periods. RFP at 1, 3-4, 40. Award was to be made to the offeror whose
         proposal was determined to represent the best value to the government,
         considering price, five technical factors, and past performance. Id. at 40-42. The
         solicitation advised that the technical factors were of equal importance to the past

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most