About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196854 1 (1984-02-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpsw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                                                  420


                 COMPMOLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                            WASH4INGTON O.C. 20648


B-1 96854                                     February 15, 1984


The Honorable Silvio 0. Conte
Ranking Minority Member                                 /
Committee on Appropriations
House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Conte:

     Your letter of July 14, 1983, asked for our views on the
impact of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha,
    U.S.     , 103 S. Ct. 2764 (1983), on the appropriations
process. As we understand that you are primarily concerned
with the continuing validity of the Impoundment Control Act,
2 U.S.C. SS 681-88 (1982), our response is directed toward a
discussion of that Act affected by Chadha.

     Chadha enunciated the fundamental proposition that the
Congress may alter a result obtained under existing authority
of law only by following the Constitutional prescription for
legislation. The Attorney General pursuant to statutory
authority had concluded that one Chadha could remain in the
United States rather than being deported. The House of
Representatives, in turn, sought to require Chadha's deporta-
tion by exercising a statutorily provided right to veto the
Attorney General's determination. The Supreme Court held that
as the Attorney General's determination was final, having been
reached in full accord with the powers and authority delegated
to him, it could be overturned only by further legislation
which under the Constitution required bicameral passage and
presentment to the President for approval. Statutory provi-
sions purporting to authorize the Congress, in effect, to
legislate without meeting these requirements were thus struck
down as unconstitutional.

     The Impoundment Control Act provides for dealing with two
types of impoundments in separate ways. Under the Act, the
President is required to report all impoundments to the Con-
gress. Funds impounded must be made available for obligation
if the Congress registers disapproval.

     For budget authority which the President seeks to have
rescinded, approval is registered by the enactment in both
houses of a required rescission bill, and disapproval is
registered by failure of both houses to pass the required

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most