About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-407273.3,B-407273.5 1 (2013-02-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadplj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          G    A     0Comptroller General
               ity * Integrity * Rellability                            of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
                                                   L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i
          Decision

          Matter of:  Burke Consortium, Inc.

          File:       B-407273.3; B-407273.5

          Date:       February 7, 2013

          Rebecca E. Pearson, Esq., Robert A. Burton, Esq., Elizabeth A. Buehler, Esq., and
          Christina K. Kube, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
          Anthony L. Washington, Esq., for Mason Harriman Group, an intervenor.
          Charles K. Bucknor Jr., Esq., Department of Homeland Security, for the agency.
          Pedro E. Briones, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest of an agency's price evaluation is denied where the agency reasonably
          concluded that an awardee's lower-priced proposal was realistic and consistent with
          its highly-rated technical proposal.

          2. Protest that an agency should have assigned lower past performance ratings
          to awardees that submitted less than the required number of past performance
          questionnaires is denied where, consistent with solicitation's evaluation criteria, the
          agency reasonably evaluated offerors' past performance based upon information in
          their proposals as well as from other available sources.

          3. Protest of an agency's selection decisions is denied where, consistent with
          the solicitation's evaluation criteria, the agency found qualitative differences in the
          protester's and awardees' proposals and reasonably concluded that the protester's
          higher-priced proposal did not provide the best value to the government.
          DECISION

          Burke Consortium, Inc., of Alexandria, Virginia, protests the Department of
          Homeland Security's (DHS) decision not to award Burke a contract under request
          for proposals (RFP) No. HSHQDC-1 1 -R-1 0001 for information technology services.
          The protester challenges the agency's technical evaluation of its proposal, as well as
          the agency's price and technical evaluations, and source selection, of a number of
          awardees' proposals.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most