About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-407779,B-407779.2 1 (2013-02-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpke0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G     A    O                                                   Comptroller General
SAcc      untabI!ityIn t RetLbi ty                                      of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
  Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                      been approved for public release.
           D e  c i s i o n                          L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


           Matter of:  MVM, Inc.

           File:       B-407779; B-407779.2

           Date:       February 21, 2013

           Michael R. Golden, Esq., Michael A. Hordell, Esq., Heather Kilgore Weiner, Esq.,
           and Samuel W. Jack, Esq., Pepper Hamilton LLP, for the protester.
           Holly A. Roth, Esq., Howard H. Yuan, Esq., Erin C. Witkow, Esq., and Michael
           Bhargava, Esq., Manatt Phelps & Phillips, LLP, for Metropolitan Interpreters and
           Translators, Inc., the intervenor.
           James E. Hicks, Esq., Department of Justice, for the agency.
           Eric M. Ransom, Esq., and Jennifer Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General
           Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Challenge to agency's evaluation of protester's proposal is denied where the
           record shows that the agency reasonably evaluated the protester's proposal in
           accordance with the solicitation's evaluation factors.

           2. Agency's selection of higher-rated, higher-priced proposal for award instead of a
           lower-rated, lower-priced proposal is unobjectionable, where the agency's tradeoff
           decision adequately documented key discriminators, included the rationale for the
           tradeoff made, and is reasonably based given the broad discretion afforded source
           selection officials.

           3. Protest that agency relied on incorrect information in its source selection
           decision is denied where, although the record shows there was an error in the
           decision, the error related to the lowest-weighted technical evaluation criterion, was
           not a factor in the agency's tradeoff analysis, and does not raise a reasonable
           possibility that protester was prejudiced.
           DECISION

           MVM, Inc., of Ashburn, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to Metropolitan
           Interpreters and Translators, Inc., of New York, New York, the incumbent
           contractor, by the Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA),

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most