About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-406696.2 1 (2012-11-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpes0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                    been approved for public release.
         D e c i s i o n                           L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   Colt Defense, LLC

         File:        B-406696.2

         Date:        November 16, 2012

         Michael A. Hordell, Esq., Michael R. Golden, Esq., Heather Kilgore Weiner, Esq.,
         and Samuel W. Jack, Esq., Pepper Hamilton LLP, for the protester.
         Holly Emrick Svetz, Esq., James K. Kearney, Esq., and Steven W. Cave, Esq.,
         Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, for Remington Arms Company, LLC, the
         intervenor.
         Wade L. Brown, Esq., and Kandis C. Gaines, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
         agency.
         Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. GAO will not resolve a dispute involving interpretation of a license agreement,
         even where the amount of the royalty fee under the agreement bears upon
         evaluation factors of the current solicitation, because this involves a matter of
         contract administration not subject to GAO's review.

         2. A price evaluation scheme included in a solicitation for weapons that accounts
         for technical data royalty fees that will be due if award is made to an offeror who is
         not the owner of the technical data is not objectionable, even though the royalty
         may not represent the ultimate royalty paid by the government under the terms of a
         technical data license agreement because the parties to the license agreement
         have not yet agreed upon the applicable royalty fee.
         DECISION

         Colt Defense, LLC, of West Hartford, Connecticut, protests the terms of request for
         proposals (RFP) No. W56HZV-10-R-0593, amendment No. 7, issued by the
         Department of the Army for standard M4 carbines and standard M4A1 carbines.
         The protester argues that the terms of the solicitation are inconsistent with the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most