About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-404479.3,B-404479.4 1 (2012-09-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpbt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O0 Comptroller General Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office ............................................................................................................................. Unsigt , Stats Gn ADOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been Decision .approved for public release. Matter of: CWTSatoTravel File: B-404479.3; B-404479.4 Date: September 24, 2012 Lars E. Anderson, Esq., James Y. Boland, Esq., and Christina K. Kube, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester. John S. Pachter, Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Mary Pat Buckenmeyer, Esq., and Armani Vadiee, Esq., Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, for Concur Technologies, Inc., the intervenor. Virginia S. Grebasch, Esq., and Kacie A. Haberly, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency. Matthew T. Crosby, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that agency unreasonably and unequally evaluated proposals is denied where record reflects that evaluation was reasonable and consistent with solicitation's evaluation criteria and that differences in offerors' evaluation findings did not result from unequal treatment. 2. Protest that discussions were misleading is denied where, notwithstanding agency representative's remarks regarding measures that might mitigate significant weakness for protester's approach of making requirements available for testing post-award, discussions transcript reflects that agency's program manager clearly conveyed that if protester continued such approach in its final proposal revision, that approach would remain a significant weakness, and highest available proposal rating would be marginal. 3. Protest challenging agency's determination to award single indefinite-delivery/ indefinite-quantity contract valued over $103 million is denied where record reflects reasonable basis for agency's conclusion that only one offeror was qualified and capable of performing work at reasonable price.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most