About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-406978.2,B-406978.3 1 (2012-08-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadozh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: SG A O Comptroller General ,!7Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. D e c i s i o n L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . .. Matter of: EOD Technology, Inc. File: B-406978.2; B-406978.3 Date: August 20, 2012 DECISION EOD Technology, Inc., of Lenoir, Tennessee, protests the corrective action taken by the Department of the Army under request for proposals (RFP) No. W91 B4L-1 2-R- 0189 for security services in Afghanistan. EOD argues that the Army improperly determined that EOD was nonresponsible, and permitted the awardee, Olive Group, of Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to begin performing the contract. We dismiss the protest. The RFP, issued on June 7, 2012, provided for award of a fixed-price contract for security services at Forward Operating Base Lindsey, Afghanistan, for a 7-month base period and two 3-month option periods. Protest at 5. Offerors were informed that award would be made to the offeror providing the lowest-priced, technically acceptable offer. Proposals were evaluated on a pass-fail basis for technical capability, pricing, eligibility requirements, and past performance. Id. at 6-7. As relevant here, under the eligibility requirements evaluation factor, offerors were required to be affirmatively determined to be responsible in accordance with the standards of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 9 and the solicitation. The Army received seven proposals, and in June awarded the contract to Olive Group. EOD received a written debriefing that informed the firm that, although EOD's proposal was otherwise technically acceptable and offered the lowest price, it was determined to be not responsible. Id. at 10. On July 5, EOD protested to our Office challenging the award to Olive Group and requesting that the Army suspend contract performance in accordance with the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most