About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-406639 1 (2012-06-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadown0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




SG              A   O                                                  Comptroller General
,7Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                             of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548



           Decision


           Matter of: CHE Consulting, Inc.

           File:       B-406639

           Date:       June 28, 2012

           Steven E. Kellogg, Esq., The Kellogg Law Firm, P.C., for the protester.
           Mark Langstein, Esq., Department of Commerce, for the agency.
           Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
           GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Protest is denied where the record shows that contracting agency reasonably
           determined that protester's quotation was unacceptable due to an ambiguity relating
           to the period of performance.
           DECISION

           CHE Consulting, Inc., of Fenton, Missouri, protests the rejection of its quote under
           request for quotes (RFQ) No. RFQ661324, issued by the Department of Commerce,
           National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for computer
           maintenance services. CHE asserts that the agency unreasonably found that its
           quotation contained an ambiguity which rendered it unacceptable.

           We deny the protest.

           The RFQ, issued on March 27, 2012, contemplated the issuance of a fixed-price
           task order for a 1-year period of performance under the successful firm's General
           Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contract. The solicitation
           specified a period of performance from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013. RFQ
           clause XI.

           In response to the RFQ, NOAA received eight quotes by the March 30 deadline and
           CHE submitted the lowest price. The agency rejected CHE's quote because the
           agency concluded that CHE's quote appeared ambiguous with regard to the
           solicitation's period of performance. Specifically, the CHE quote included the
           following language:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most