About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-405673.3 1 (2012-05-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadouz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A O0 Comptroller General Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. D e c i s i o n L .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . .. Matter of: Wegco, Inc. File: B-405673.3 Date: May 21, 2012 James S. DelSordo, Esq., Argus Legal, LLC, for the protester. E. Sanderson Hoe, Esq., and Justin M. Ganderson, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, for PM Services Company, the intervenor Timothy C. Tozer, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency. Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., and Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest that agency improperly determined protester's proposal to be technically unacceptable is denied where the proposal failed to comply with the solicitation's requirements relating to proof of licenses for key personnel. DECISION Wegco, Inc., of Washington, D.C., protests the award of a contract by the General Services Administration (GSA) to PM Services Company, of St. Petersburg, Florida, under request for proposals (RFP) No. GS-1 1 P-i 1 -MA-C-0240, for building operation and maintenance services. Wegco contends that the agency improperly found the firm's proposal technically unacceptable. We deny the protest. BACKGROUND GSA published the RFP on July 11, 2011, as a small business set-aside seeking proposals to perform building operations and maintenance services at GSA's Nebraska Avenue Complex in Washington, D.C. RFP at 2. The RFP contemplated the award of a fixed-price contract with a 1-year base period and four 1-year options. RFP at B.5. Award was to be made on a lowest-priced technically- acceptable basis. RFP at 2. Technical acceptability was based on the evaluation of four factors: past performance, relevant experience, key personnel and management capabilities. RFP at 31.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most