About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

P00457 1 (2009-03-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadotr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


















   Operation and
 Maintenance, Army
 (OMA), Defense
   Environmental
Restoration Account
(DERA), Research,
   Development,
   Technical, and
Evaluation (RDT&E),
Military Construction,
    Army (MCA)


            FY 1996 to
10/24/2007  FY1995


$2,713,681.00


31 U.S.C. §§
1341 (a)(1)(A),
   1517(a)


Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG)
personnel improperly obligated a mix of
FYs 1997 & 1998 OMA and FYs 1996,
1997, & 1998 DERA appropriations to
renovate a building. The work that was
classified as renovation was actually
minor military construction. The Army
reported an Antideficiency Act (ADA)
violation because funds in the accounts
it identified as the correct accounts, FY
1996 RDT&E, FY 1996 OMA, and FY
1997 MCA, were not continuously
available from the time of obligation to
the time of correction.


The responsible official was
given an oral reprimand. The
Army deobligated the improperly
obligated funds and applied
funds from the RDT&E, OMA,
and MCA accounts to cover the
costs. APG has begun to more
rigorously review funding of all
construction/repair orders.


4        +              +                    I            4                             I                                                    +


ADA-08-02      06-10   Department of
                         the Army


  Operation and
Maintenance, Army
      (OMA)


11/5/2007   9/22/2003;
            9/30/2003


$130,257.03*


   31 U.S.C.
§ 1341 (a)(1)(B)


Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento
District, obligated expiring FY 2003
OMA funds on September 22 & 30,
2003, as part of the issuance of two
orders to the General Services
Administration for FY 2004 technical
and administrative support services.
Because the orders were placed before
the enactment of the FY 2004
appropriations act and did not include a
clause providing that the obligation was
contingent upon enactment of the
appropriation, the obligations in FY
2003 for FY 2004 services violated the
ADA.


Responsible officials received
letters of counseling. The Corps
charged the correct FY 2004
accounts for the Army's
obligations. The Corps
implemented a new system for
processing interagency orders
and service contracts. The
Corps issued a new fund
certification policy permitting only
Resource Management
personnel to certify funds for
government orders and
contractual services.


Source: Unaudited information GAO extracted from agency Antideficiency Act reports; for further information about a specific report, please contact the relevant agency.
* The two order amounts were $102,988.38 and $119, 536.63, totaling $222,525.01. The investigative team determined that some of the line items on the obligations appropriately cited funds that were not
expiring for new obligations on 9/30/03 and were therefore properly funded. After that amount ($92,267.98) was subtracted the total amount reported for the violations was $130,257.03.


United States Government Accountability Office
www.gao.gov


Antideficiency Act Report Information, FY 2008
                               Page 1 of 14


ADA-08-01


03-09


Department of
  the Army

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most