About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405932.3 1 (2012-04-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadotc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A    O                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of:  LGS Innovations LLC

         File:       B-405932.3

         Date:       April 26, 2012

         Thomas L. McGovern III, Esq., Andrew C. Ertley, Esq., and C. Peter Dungan, Esq.,
         Hogan Lovells US LLP, for the protester.
         Maj. James W. Nelson, Department of the Army, for the agency.
         Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Reimbursement of protest costs based on agency corrective action is not warranted
         where the protest was not clearly meritorious.
         DECISION

         LGS Innovations LLC requests that we recommend that it be reimbursed the costs
         of filing and pursuing its protests challenging the Department of the Army's issuance
         of delivery order No. W91 QUZ-06-D-0021/0009 to AT&T Government Solutions for
         infrastructure modernization at the Wiesbaden, Germany Command Battle Center
         (CBC).

         We deny the request.

         The RFP provided for the issuance, on a best value basis, of a fixed-price delivery
         order to provide a turnkey solution to upgrade and modernize the voice and data
         networks at the CBC. Proposals were to be evaluated under three factors:
         technical, management, and price. When the agency issued the delivery order to
         AT&T, LGS protested, asserting that the technical evaluation was unreasonable
         based on LGS's belief that the agency had applied an unstated evaluation
         preference for AT&T's technical solution; that the best value, tradeoff determination
         was flawed; and that the agency failed to conduct meaningful or equal discussions
         related to the preferred technical solution. In its agency report, the Army denied
         applying any unstated evaluation preference and defended both its best value
         determination and its conduct of discussions.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most