About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401874.14,B-401874.15 1 (2011-11-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoqz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


    i

          SG    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
.in     Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                       The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been

           D  e c i s i o n                            a _proved for public release -e-le -s-e.


           Matter of: General Dynamics, American Overseas Marine

           File:        B-401874.14; B-401874.15

           Date:        November 1, 2011

           J. Alex Ward, Esq., Edward Jackson, Esq., Daniel E. Chudd, Esq., Ethan E. Marsh,
           Esq., and Damien C. Specht, Esq., Jenner & Block, for the protester.
           Robert E. Korroch, Esq., Francis E. Purcell, Esq., William A. Wozniak, Esq., Anthony
           A. Anikeeff, Esq., and Walter J. Skinner, Esq., Williams Mullen, for Maersk Line,
           Limited, the intervenor.
           Kimberly G. Foxx, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
           John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
           Counsel, GAO, participated in the decision.
           DIGEST

           1. Agency properly did not evaluate fixed-price proposals for price realism where
           the solicitation did not provide for such an evaluation.

           2. Agency properly did not consider in its price evaluation the protester's proposed
           cost savings with regard to certain items and services where the solicitation did not
           request any price or cost information regarding these items and did not include any
           terms providing for the evaluation of these costs.

           3. Agency properly considered the availability of certain of the awardee's parent
           company's resources where there was no provision in the solicitation that precluded
           offerors from relying on the resources of the corporate parent in performing the
           contract, and the awardee's proposal represented through its reference to the parent
           company's resources that the resources would be committed to the contract.

           4. The agency's selection of a slightly lower-rated, lower-priced proposal for award
           of a contract for the operation and maintenance of certain ships is unobjectionable
           where the evaluation and source selection were adequately documented, consistent
           with the terms of the solicitation, and reasonably based.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most