About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-405846,B-405846.2 1 (2012-01-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadolt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A 0 Comptroller General lAccoauntability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 Decision Matter of: Freedom Systems, LLC File: B-405846; B-405846.2 Date: January 5, 2012 Reginald B. McFadden for the protester. Darian A. Stanford, Esq., Slinde Nelson, for Command Management Services, Inc., the intervenor. Capt. Michael E. Murray, Department of the Army, for the agency. Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest challenging agency's evaluation and rejection of proposal as technically unacceptable is denied where the record reflects that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation. DECISION Freedom Systems, LLC, of Manassas, Virginia, protests the evaluation and rejection of its proposal as technically unacceptable, and the award of a contract to Command Management Services, Inc. (CMS), of Portland, Oregon, under request for proposal (RFP) No. W9124D-1 1-R-0029, issued by the Department of the Army for meals, lodging and transportation for Armed Forces applicants processing through the Baltimore Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS), Baltimore, Maryland. We deny the protest. The RFP, issued on May 18, 2011, anticipated the award of a fixed-price requirements contract for a base year and four 1-year option periods to the firm that submitted the proposal deemed most advantageous to the agency considering technical evaluation factors for mission capability and past performance (where mission capability was to be significantly more important than past performance), and price (where the technical factors combined were to be significantly more important than price). RFP at 15. Each offeror was required to submit an original proposal (including the firm's technical proposal and price proposal) and four copies of its technical proposal. The RFP emphasized that the proposal submissions, including each copy, was to be

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most