About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405681 1 (2011-12-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadokc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



          G    A                                                        Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability             of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision

          Matter of: Sevatec, Inc.

          File:        B-405681

          Date:     December 9, 2011

          Sonny Kakar and Angela D. Leno, Sevatec, Inc., for the protester.
          Rand L. Allen, Esq., Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Brian G. Walsh, Esq., and
          Tracye Winfrey Howard, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., an
          intervenor.
          Herman J. Narcho, Esq., Department of Labor, for the agency.
          Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest that agency misevaluated protester's quotation in competition for Federal
          Supply Schedule blanket purchase agreement is denied where resumes in
          protester's quotation showed that the candidates lacked the qualifications specified
          in the solicitation for their respective positions, and thus the evaluation of the
          protester's quotation as unacceptable was reasonable, supported by the record, and
          consistent with the solicitation.
          DECISION

          Sevatec, Inc., of Falls Church, Virginia, a small business, protests the issuance of a
          Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) blanket purchase agreement (BPA) to Booz Allen
          Hamilton, Inc. (BAH), of McLean, Virginia, by the Department of Labor (DoL) under
          request for quotations (RFQ) No. DOLl 11 RQ21285 for information technology
          support services. Sevatec argues that its quotation was misevaluated under the key
          personnel factor of the RFQ, and was unreasonably rejected as unacceptable.

          We deny the protest.'


          1 Sevatec was not represented by counsel who could seek access to nonpublic
          information under a protective order. Accordingly, our discussion is necessarily
          general in some respects to avoid disclosure of nonpublic proprietary information.
                                                                            (continued...)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most