About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-405155.3 1 (2011-10-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadogg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   i

G              A     0                                                Comptroller General
     Accuntabiity * Integrity * Reliability                            of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Science Applications International Corporation

          File:       B-405155.3

          Date:       October 3, 2011

          William L. Walsh, Jr., Esq., J. Scott Hommer III, Esq., George W. Wyatt IV, Esq., and
          Brendan M. Lill, Esq., Venable LLP, for the protester.
          Col. Mark S. Teskey, and W. Michael Rose, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the
          agency.
          Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Scott H. Riback, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          GAO recommends reimbursement of protest costs where procuring agency took
          corrective action after parties were informed through alternative dispute resolution
          (ADR) procedures the protest was clearly meritorious.
          DECISION

          Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), of McLean, Virginia, requests
          that our Office recommend that it be reimbursed the costs of filing and pursuing its
          protest challenging a determination by the Department of the Air Force to eliminate
          SAIC's proposal--based on an alleged organizational conflict of interest (OCI)--from
          the competition under request for proposals No. FA8707-1 1-R-0007, for the Air and
          Space Operations Center weapon system modernization program.

          We grant the request.

          SAIC protested that the agency unreasonably determined that the protester had an
          unequal access to information OCI which disqualified it from participating in the
          competition; that it failed to treat all offerors equally in this regard; and that it failed
          to follow the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). In response
          to SAIC's protest, the agency submitted a report to which SAIC filed comments and a
          supplemental protest. After the agency submitted a supplemental report and SAIC
          submitted its comments, the cognizant GAO attorney held an alternative dispute
          resolution (ADR) conference, in which he engaged in outcome prediction. He
          advised the parties that it was not clear from the record that the agency's

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most