About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-404985,B-404985.2 1 (2011-07-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadoft0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



J         G    A                                                         Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENTFoR-PUBICRELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                      a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                      been approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of:   Systems Technologies, Inc.

          File:        B-404985; B-404985.2

          Date:        July 20, 2011

          Marc Lamer, Esq., Kostos & Lamer, PC, for the protester.
          James J. McCullough, Esq., and Michael J. Anstett, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris,
          Shriver & Jacobson LLP, for Sciences Applications International Corporation;
          Thomas L. McGovern III, Esq., Andrew C. Ertley, Esq., and Emily M.Q. Schriver,
          Esq., Hogan Lovells US LLP, for General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.;
          and Nicole Y. Beeler, Esq., John E. Jensen, Esq., Evan D. Wesser, Esq., and Daniel
          S. Herzfeld, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, for NCI Information
          Systems, Inc., the intervenors.
          Wade L. Brown, Esq., and Janet K. Baker, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency's significant upward adjustments to the protester's low proposed labor
          hours based on the independent government estimate in cost realism analysis,
          where the protester's proposal failed to provide sufficient detail, was reasonably
          supported by the record and hearing testimony.

          2. Agency improperly failed to make downward adjustment in the protester's
          proposed costs in cost realism analysis to exclude costs for work that was not within
          the scope of the solicited requirement; however, the protester was not prejudiced by
          this error.

          3. Protest of technical evaluation of protester's proposal is denied where the
          protester's arguments merely disagree with the agency's evaluation judgment.
          DECISION

          Systems Technologies, Inc. (Systek), of West Long Branch, New Jersey, protests
          awards of contracts to General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. (GDIT), of
          Fairfax, Virginia, NCI Information Systems, Inc. (NCI), of Reston, Virginia, and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most