About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-241018 1 (1991-02-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnvn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

..Comptrofler General
           of the United States
           Waalngton, D.C. 20548

           Decision




           Matter of: Martha E. Brantingham

           File:       B-241018

           Date:        February 22, 1991


           DECISION

           A decision has been requested as to whether the reclaim travel
           voucher submitted by Ms. Martha E. Brantingham, an employee of
           the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), for reimbursement of
           expenses incurred during a househunting trip, may be certified
           for payment.1/ For the reasons stated in this decision, the
           voucher may not be certified for payment.

           Ms. Brantingham was transferred from Anchorage, Alaska, to
           Denver, Colorado, by travel authorization dated August 9,
           1988. The IRS erroneously authorized reimbursement for
           expenses incurred by Ms. Brantingham during a househunting
           trip. She was given an advance of funds in the amount of
           $5,100 for expenses incurred for househunting, change of
           official duty station, and the first 30 days of temporary
           quarters occupancy. The IRS also paid the cost of airfare
           ($1,527.96) for Ms. Brantingham and her husband for the
           househunting trip. After they completed the trip, the IRS
           disallowed her claim for reimbursement because the regulations
           do not allow a househunting trip from Alaska.2/

           The IRS disallowance was correct. Section 5724a(a) (2) of
           title 5, United States Code (1988), provides for reimbursement
           of the expenses of a househunting trip only when both the old
           and new duty stations are located within the continental
           United States. For purposes of that statute, the term
           continental United States excludes Alaska. See 5 U.S.C.
           § 5721(3) (1988). Thus, in Eugene B. Roche, B-205041, May 28,
           1982, where the employee was transferred from Kansas City,


           1/ The claim was submitted by Ms. Linda B. Spellins, Chief,
           Accounting Section, Southwest Region, Internal Revenue
           Service, Department of the Treasury.

           2/ See Federal Travel Regulations, para. 2-4.1c(3), FPMR
           f01-7 (Supp. 4, Oct. 1, 1982), incorp. by ref., 41 C.F.R.
           § 101-7.003 (1988); and § 320(4), ch. 300, Internal Revenue
           Manual 1764.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most