About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-237947 1 (1990-01-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnrb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: &:A   iCb1 kv613)


AThe Comptroller General
         of the United States
         Washington, D.C. 20548
         Decision




         Matterof: Carol J. Carter
         File:
                   B-237947

         Date:     January 18, 1990


         DECISION

         A certifying officer for the Department of Health and Human
         Services requests an advance decision whether Ms. Carol J.
         Carter's claim for a forfeited real estate deposit may be
         separately paid as a residential transaction selling expense
         rather than being included in the miscellaneous expenses
         category for relocations. Ms. Carter had contracted to buy
         a house at her old duty station when she responded to a
         vacancy announcement, accepted a new job, and then trans-
         ferred to a new duty station in 1987. The transfer caused
         the forfeiture of her $500 real estate deposit when she
         decided not to go through with the contract to purchase
         the new house at the old duty station. That new house was
         never her residence.

         A forfeited real estate deposit may not be claimed as a
         real estate selling expense under 5 U.S.C. S 5724a(a)(4)
         and its implementing regulations because those provisions
         only authorize reimbursement of expenses pertaining to an
         employee's residence. However, the forfeited deposit may
         be claimed under the miscellaneous expense allowance for
         transfers provided by 5 U.S.C. S 5724a(b) (1982) and
         implementing regulations in the Federal Travel Regulations
         (FTR), para. 2-3.3 (Supp. 4, Aug. 23, 1982), incorp. by
         ref., 41 C.F.R. S 101-7.003 (1987). Gary R. Evans,
         B-733673, Nov. 7, 1989; Ralph A. Neeper, B-195920, June 30,
         1980.

         Ms. Carter already has been paid the lump-sum $700
         miscellaneous expense allowance prescribed in FTR
         para. 2-3.3a, which is payable without documentation
         of actual expenses incurred. Although under FTR,
         para. 2-3.3b greater reimbursement may be made for mis-
         cellaneous expenses than the $700 allowance already paid,






                                   02

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most