About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-233946.2 1 (1989-12-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnqs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: -,; ' \ K.- a-


uThe Comptroller General
           of the United States
           Washington, D.C. 20848

           Decision



           Matter of: David Robledo

           File:     B-233946.2

           Date:     December 14, 1989


           DECISION

           The issue in this case is whether an Office of Personnel
           Management (OPM) regulation may be waived in setting
           Mr. David Robledo's rate of basic pay upon his reinstatement
           with the Bureau of Reclamation.l/   For the following
           reasons, the regulation may not be waived.

           When Mr. Robledo was employed previously, the agency paid
           him a special rate of pay in excess of the general schedule
           pay rate for his grade and step level under the authority in
           5 U.S.C. S 5303 (1982). His employment was terminated, and
           when he was reinstated the agency applied 5 C.F.R.
           S 531.203(d)(3) (1988) in determining his highest previous
           rate of pay. That regulation provides that where an
           employee's rate of pay was established under 5 U.S.C.
           S 5303, the highest previous rate is the scheduled rate
           rather than the special rate. As a result, when Mr. Robledo
           was reinstated, his pay was properly reduced from $36,819 to
           $35,065. Although the regulation further provides that an
           agency may apply for approval to use the special rate as the
           highest previous rate under certain specified circumstances,
           the Bureau declined to apply for such an exception in this
           case, presumably because the special circumstances did not
           exist.

           OPM issued the regulation contained in 5 C.F.R.
           S 31.203(d)(3) pursuant to the authority provided in
           5 U.S.C. SS 5115 and 5538. Therefore, the regulation has
           the force and effect of law. Under these circumstances,
           there is no authority for the Bureau of Reclamation or our
           Office to waive the regulation. See Jon P. Kindice,



           1/ The Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of
           the Interior, requested a decision on this question,
           reference D-7520.





                                      04-1 3z,(

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most