About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-234499 1 (1989-08-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnok0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

tTho Comptroller General
            of the United States
            Washington, D.C. 20548
    IS      Decision




            Matterof:  Patrick W. Whalen

            File:      B-234499

            Date:      August 29, 1989


            DECISION

            Mr. Whalen performed relocation travel by car accompanied by
            his wife, 18 year old dependent daughter, and non-dependent
            brother-in-law. He claims reimbursement for 4 days per diem
            and return travel by air for his brother-in-law. According
            to Mr. Whalen, he was unable to drive a vehicle or carry
            luggage due to a work-related injury. Therefore, he needed
            his brother-in-law's assistance in connection with his move.

            Relocation travel reimbursement generally is limited to the
            employee and his or her immediate family. See 5 U.S.C.
            SS 5724 and 5724a (1982); Federal Travel Regulations,
            incorp, by ref., 41 C.F.R. S 101-7.003 (1988), ch. 2, part
            2. our decisions have allowed travel expense reimbursement
            for other persons accompanying a transferred employee or the
            employee's dependents in unusual cases where the services of
            the other person were essential. See E. Breland Collier,
            59 Comp. Gen. 675 (1980) (attendant for blind employee
            whose spouse also was blind); Harold R. Jordan, B-191284,
            Sept. 22, 1978 (escort for employee's minor children who
            traveled by air where airline regulations required such
            children to be accompanied by an adult).

            In the present case, however, Mr. Whalen has made no showing
            that the services of his brother-in-law were essential, as
            opposed to being merely convenient. For example, there is
            no indication that Mr. Whalen's spouse and daughter could
            not have handled the driving and the luggage. Compare
            E. Breland Collier, supra, 59 Comp. Gen. at 677.

            Accordingly, Mr. Whalen's claim may not be allowed.




            James F. Hi chman:'
            General Counsel

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most