About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-234166 1 (1989-08-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnnt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

~~i.LA o*The Comptroller General
        of the United States
        Washington, D.C. 20548

        Decision


                   Soil Conservation Service--Termination of
        Matter of- Collection Action

        File:       B-234166

        Date:       August 14, 1989

        DIGEST

        The Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,
        may not terminate collection of a debt arising from
        underpayment of the Department's proportionate share of a
        settlement payment made to a grant recipient by its
        contractor's surety company. Under the Federal Claims
        Collection Standards, collection action may be terminated if
        there is no legal basis for recovery by the United States.
        Because the Department of Agriculture has a significant
        basis for recovery, it must proceed with collection action.

        DECISION

        The Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
        (SCS), has submitted a claim against the Batavia Kill
        Watershed District (District) for resolution and
        instructions under 4 C.F.R. S 105.1(c) prior to referral by
        SCS to the U.S. Department of Justice. As will be explained
        below, there exists no law or regulation which would
        authorize SCS to terminate collection action and,
        therefore, the debt should be collected.

        BACKGROUND

        According to the submission, in 1973, under a watershed
        workplan agreement and a project agreement, the District
        contracted for construction of a multipurpose structure.
        The federal cost share of the structure was 96.12 percent.
        The contractor failed to diligently pursue the work and the
        District terminated its right to proceed. The contractor's
        surety refused to take over the contract and, consequently,
        the District reprocured the work at an additional cost of
        $574,678.27, with the federal government paying 96.12
        percent ($552,380). After protracted litigation between the
        District and the surety, the surety paid the District
        $600,000 in settlement of the District's claim. Out of this
        amount, the District paid $110,000 as legal fees to the
        attorney who represented it in the court actions against the





                                     /

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most