About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-233183 1 (1989-03-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnka0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

*The Comptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 205

             Decision


                         Estate of John A. Thomas - Unpaid Compensation
             Matter of:
                         B-233183
             File:

             Date:       March 3, 1989

             DIGEST

             The claims by his mother and alleged son for unpaid
             compensation due a deceased civilian employee are too
             doubtful to be allowed without resolution by a court of
             competent jurisdiction. The alleged son's claim is higher
             on the statutory list of distribution; however, his status
               as son is based on a document executed by the deceased in
               El Salvador recognizing him as the deceased's son, and other
               information of record makes his status as biological son
               questionable.


               DECISION

               ISSUE

               This is in response to a request for reconsideration of our
               Claims Group's determination Z-2865725, July 13, 1988,
               concerning the claims for the unpaid compensation in the
               amount of $4,447.81 due Mr. John A. Thomas, a deceased
               civilian employee. That determination considered the
               competing claims of Mrs. June P. Thomas, as mother, and that
               of Mr. Manuel de Jesus Thomas Rivas, as son based on a
               notarized recognition document stating that it was filed by
               Mr. Thomas with the civil court of El Salvador. The Claims
               Group concluded that there was too much doubt to warrant
               payment to either claimant. Mrs. Thomas takes exception to
               that finding and has requested reconsideration of her claim
               based on her contention that the recognition document is
               fraudulent and should be considered void. For the reasons
               stated below we conclude that, in the absence of a deter-
               mination by a court of competent jurisdiction as to whether
               the document filed by Mr. Thomas recognizing Mr. Rivas as
               his son is valid, the status of Mr. Rivas as his son is too
               uncertain to authorize payment to either of the claimants.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most