About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-230840 1 (1988-08-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnel0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
The ComptroUer General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision


          Helen M. Jew - Highest Previous Rate Rule -
Matter of: Intermittent Employment

File:      B-230840

Date:      August 18, 1988


DIGEST

An employee who previously held a position as an intermit-
tent employee is not eligible for highest previous rate
consideration upon reemployment under 5 C.F.R. S 531.203(c)
(1987), since the highest previous rate rule is based upon a
regularly scheduled tour of duty and intermittent employment
by definition does not involve a regularly scheduled tour of
duty. Moreover, in this case the employee was properly
classified as an intermittent employee inasmuch as the
employee independently scheduled her work and the days and
hours worked fluctuated each pay period.


DECISION

Ms. Helen M. Jew has appealed the determination by our
Claims Group (Z-2865303, dated Dec. 28, 1987) denying her
claim for a retroactive step increase and backpay since the
highest previous rate rule in 5 C.F.R. S 531.203 (1987)
applies only to full-time and part-time employees and not to
intermittent employees. For the reasons stated below, we
sustain the Claims Group's determination.

BACKGROUND

Ms. Jew was an intermittent employee grade GS-12, step 1,
Equal Employment Specialist with the Department of the Navy
(Navy) from March 2, 1986 through January 5, 1987, when she
was separated as part of a reduction-in-force. Subse-
quently, Ms. Jew was reemployed by the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on April 6, 1987, and she was
placed in grade GS-II, step 4. If the EEOC had applied the
highest previous rate rule contained in 5 C.F.R.
S 531.203(c) (1987), under which a reemployed employee's
rate of pay may be set at the highest previous rate earned
on a regular tour of duty, Ms. Jew would have been placed in
grade GS-II, step 7. The EEOC declined to apply this rule
based on the agency's position that intermittent employment






                                           3

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most