About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-226546,B-226791 1 (1988-06-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnck0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

IThe Comptroller General
           of the United States
           Washington, D.C. 20548

           Decision


                     Lieutenant Colonel Ralph E. Marker, Jr., USA
           Matterof- (Retired), and others--Dual Compensation
                     Restrictions
           File:     B-226546, B-226791

           Date:     June 3, 1988



           DIGEST

           1. In Denkler v. United States, 782 F.2d 1003 (Fed. Cir.
           1986), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
           that military retirees were exempt from the restrictions
           of 5 U.S.C. §§ 5531 and 5532 when employed by the Board of
           Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Comptroller
           General will follow the court's judgment, and overrules
           the prior contrary administrative decision in Lieutenant
           Colonel Robert E. Frazier, USA (Retired), 63 Comp. Gen. 123
           (1983). Military retirees employed by the Federal Reserve
           Board who were not plaintiffs in the Denkler litigation may
           be allowed refunds of amounts previously deducted from
           their retired pay, subject to the 6-year limitation period
           prescribed by 31 U.S.C. S 3702(b).

           2. A retired Army officer employed in a civilian posi-
           tion with the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste
           Management, Department of Energy, is not exempt from the
           dual compensation restrictions of 5 U.S.C. S§ 5531 and 5532
           on the basis of the court's decision in Denkler v. United
           States, 782 F.2d 1003 (Fed. Cir. 1986), to the effect that
           positions with the Federal Reserve Board are not covered
           by those restrictions because the Board is a non-
           appropriated fund instrumentality. The Department of
           Energy collects fees from corporations which generate
           nuclear waste, and it uses those funds to pay the salaries
           of the employees of the Office of Civilian Radioactive
           Waste Management. However, the funds are required by
           law to be deposited in the Treasury and are spent by the
           Department of Energy under statutory authority constituting
           a continuing appropriation; therefore, they are considered
           appropriated funds; and the Office of Civilian Radioactive
           Waste Management is not a non-appropriated fund instrumen-
           tality for purposes of the dual compensation restrictions.


QAAZ-' 356

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most