About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-229457 1 (1988-05-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadnbv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

CR       The Comptroller General
         of the United States
         Washington, C. 20548
         Decision



                   Donald R. Stacy - Permanent Change of Station -
         Matterof- Relocation Expense Benefits

         File:     B-229457

         Date:     May 6, 1988



         DIGEST

         1. An employee stationed in New Orleans was transferred
         to Baltimore. The only residence he owned was located
         in Atlanta where his family lived. His request to be reim-
         bursed the expense of selling his Atlanta residence is
         denied. Under paragraphs 2-1.4i and 2-6.1 of the Federal
         Travel Regulations, in order for a residence to qualify for
         sales expense reimbursement, the employee must live there
         and regularly commute to and from his worksite from that
         residence. The record shows that he rented quarters in
         New Orleans from which he commuted to work daily and only
         occupied the Atlanta residence on weekends and holidays.

         2. An employee stationed in New Orleans was transferred to
         Baltimore. He was granted a 1-year extension of time to
         purchase a residence in the Baltimore area, but the agency
         denied an extension of time to initiate the travel of his
         immediate family and ship his household goods. That action
         was erroneous and has now been corrected. Under paragraph
         2-1.5a(2) of the Federal Travel Regulations, an employee who
         has been granted an extension of time to complete approved
         real estate transactions is automatically entitled to an
         equal extension period to initiate family travel and ship
         household goods.

         3. An employee stationed in New Orleans was transferred
         to Baltimore and was authorized the maximum 3-year period,
         including a 1-year extension, to purchase a residence in the
         Baltimore area, initiate the travel of his immediate family,
         and ship his household goods. Because of unusual circum-
         stances, the employee seeks an unlimited extension period
         within which to complete all aspects of his permanent
         change-of-station move. His request is denied since the
         maximum time limit imposed by paragraph 2-6.1e of the
         Federal Travel Regulations has already been granted and
         there is no basis upon which an additional extension period





                              04;O     /j/3-S7s/

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most