About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-227485 1 (1987-11-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmxd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

0LXA 0     The Comptroller General

            of the United States
trWashington, D.C. 20548
            Decision



                      Edward C. Licht- Actual Subsistence Expenses -
            Matterof: Itemization of Meal Costs

            File:     B-227485

            Date:     November 6, 1987


            DIGEST

            An employee in a travel status in April and May 1984 was
            authorized reimbursement on an actual expense basis, and he
            claimed meal expenses in excess of the agency guideline
            permitting reimbursement up to 45 percent of the daily
            maximum per diem rate, as reasonable, without requiring
            further justification. The employee later reduced his claim
            to an amount equal to the 45 percent guideline, but again
            did not itemize his daily meal costs. The agency, recogniz-
            ing that he had incurred some meal costs, reimbursed him
            less than 45 percent of the applicable rate. The employee
            claims additional reimbursement, arguing that since his
            revised claim did not exceed 45 percent of maximum per diem,
            he is not required to itemize or further justify his
            expenses. His claim may not be paid since paragraphs 1-8.5
            and 1-11.5(b)(2) of the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR)
            require subsistence expense itemization to at least permit
            agency review. While written agency guidelines may
            authorize, as reasonable, subsistence reimbursement up to
            45 percent of a maximum per diem rate, such guidelines do
            not supersede other requirements of law or statutory
            regulations. Therefore, we concur with the agency action to
            require the employee to comply with FTR requirements to
            support his additional claim.


            DECISION

            This decision is in response to a letter from Mr. Edward C.
            Licht. He is appealing our Claims Group settlement
            Z-2864340, March 31, 1987, which disallowed additional
            subsistence expense reimbursement to him incident to a
            temporary duty assignment. We sustain that disallowance for
            the following reasons.

            BACKGROUND

            Mr. Edward C. Licht, an employee of the Internal Revenue
            Service, Department of the Treasury, performed temporary




                                                   :,               154r1. ~

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most