About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-226795 1 (1987-08-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmul0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


.The Comptroller General
           of the United States
           Washington, D.C. 20548
           Decision





           Matterof:  Carl R. Leonard - Commuting Costs: Temporary
                      Duty vs. Permanent Change of Official Station
           File:      B-226795

           Date:      August 20, 1987


           DIGEST

           1. Claim for mileage for commuting between Mitchell,
           Indiana, and Tell City, Indiana, over a 3-year period is
           denied since an employee must bear the cost of commuting
           between his residence and his official duty station.

           2. Whether a particular duty station is permanent or
           temporary is a question of fact to be determined from the
           orders, and where necessary, from the character of the
           assignment, particularly the duration and nature of the
           duty. Where the employee was given permanent duty, change-
           of-station travel orders, advanced relocation expenses and
           assigned the same type of field engineering work at the new
           duty station, the assignment is a permanent duty assignment.
           The permanent character of the assignment is not affected by
           the employee's retransfer after 3 years to a prior duty
           station.

           3. Claim for overtime compensation for time spent commuting
           between Mitchell, Indiana, and Tell City, Indiana, outside
           of the normal duty hours is denied. The general rule is
           that time spent traveling between an employee's residence
           and his permanent duty station is not compensable
           traveltime.

           4. The General Accounting Office will not inquire into
           matters relating to a grievance. Such matters are within
           the jurisdiction of the employing agency and the Office of
           Personnel Management.


           DECISION

           This responds to a request by Mr. G. E. Tipton, an author-
           ized certifying officer of the Forest Service, United States
           Department of Agriculture (USDA), for a decision on the
           claim of Mr. Carl R. Leonard, an employee of the Forest
           Service. Mr. Leonard, a resident of Mitchell, Indiana,
           requests $43,525.85 for mileage and overtime compensation in


('7)5qr 19

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most