About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-220322 1 (1987-03-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmpn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
JA~A-~ J~


The Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision


             Transfer of Funds from the Railroad Retirement
Matter of-   Account to the Social Security Equivalent Benefit
             Account
File:        B-220322

Date:        March 9, 1987
   DIGEST

   Decision by Railroad Retirement Board (Board) to treat trans-
   fer of funds from the Railroad Retirement Account (RRA) to
   the Social Security Equivalent Benefit Account (SSEBA) on
   October 1, 1984, as a loan from the RRA that the SSEBA was
   subsequently required to repay with interest is correct.
   Under 45 U.S.C. § 231n-1, which established the SSEBA as a
   separate account effective October 1, 1984, to pay social
   security equivalent benefits due railroad retirees on or
   after that date, SSEBA is in effect, authorized to borrow
   funds from the RRA if needed to make monthly benefit
   payments.

   DECISION

   This decision is in response to a letter dated September 17,
   1985, from the Executive Director of the Railroad Retirement
   Board (Board) requesting our legal opinion as to the cor-
   rectness of the method by which funds were transferred from
   the Railroad Retirement Account * * * to the Social Security
   Equivalent Benefit Account * * * to allow for the payment of
   benefits from the latter account on October 1, 1984.

   As explained in the letter, the Board, which administers both
   accounts, treated the transfer as a loan from the Railroad
   Retirement Account (RRA) to the Social Security Equivalent
   Benefit Account (SSEBA) that was subsequently repaid by the
   SSEBA with interest. Later, the Office of Management and
   Budget (OMB) questioned whether the original transfer from
   the RRA constituted a loan or whether the transfer should
   have been treated as a nonreimbursable outlay from the RRA
   that was required to satisfy a valid obligation of that
   account.

   As a result of the question over the Board's treatment of the
   transfer of funds, the Board requested our opinion. For the
   reasons set forth hereafter, we conclude that the Board's
   position, that the transfer in question constituted a loan
   from the RRA to the SSEBA that the latter account was re-
   quired to repay, is correct.


08m1 -13.23 6

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most