About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-218645 1 (1986-09-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmmq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



           The Comptroler General
           of the United States
( 7) ;     Washington. D.C. 20548

           Decision



           Matterof:   Thomas D. Mulder - Relocation Expenses -
                       Inter-Agency Transfer
           File:       B-218645

           Date:       September Z9,  1986



           DIGEST

           I. An employee involved in an inter-agency transfer in
           the interest of the government without a break in service,
           which also involved vested overseas return travel rights
           from Alaska, is entitled to relocation expenses under
           5 U.S.C. §.i 5724 and 5724a. Milton J. Parsons, 58 Comp.
           Gen. 783 (1979), distinguished.

           2. An employee transferred in the interest of the government
           was not issued travel orders. However, travel orders are
           not essential for relocation expense reimbursement. While
           the issuance of travel orders demonstrates an agency's inten-
           tion to transfer an employee, the absence of such orders is
           not fatal to those relocation expense reimbursement rights
           if there is other objective evidence of that transfer inten-
           tion. Orville H. Myers, 57 Comp. Gen. 447 (1978).

           3. An employee transferred in the interest of the
           government did not execute a service agreement incident
           to that transfer. However, lack of such an agreement
           does not defeat relocation expense reimbursement. The
           statutory condition to payment of relocation expenses
           incident to such a transfer is that the employee remain
           in government service without a break in service for a
           minimum-of 12 months following transfer. So long as
           that condition is met, relocation expenses may be paid.
           Baltazar A. Villarreal, B-214244, May 22, 1984. Time
           with a particular agency is not a condition precedent to
           relocation expense reimbursement. Finn v. united States,
           102 Ct. Cl. 814 (1970).

           4. Ordinarily, all relocation expense reimbursements under
           5 U.S.C. §§ 5724 and 5724a associated with an inter-agency
           transfer are the sole responsibility of the gaining agency.
           5 U.S.C. S 5724(e). However, where an employee also has
           vested return travel rights under 5 U.S.C. § 5722, these are

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most