About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-222230.2,B-222231.2 1 (1986-07-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmju0001 and id is 1 raw text is: I- 6 'S L4r 0The Comptroller General of the United States Wa&hington, D.C. 20548 Decision Matter of- hi-Grade Logging, Inc.--keconsideration File: B-Z22ZJU.2; b-ZZ.42J1.2 Date: July 18, 1986 UlUESi Kequest tor reconsideration that alleges facts anu maKes arguments that coulo have oeen presented at the time of the protest does not provide a basis fur reconsideration. DECISION Hi-Grade Logging, Inc. (i-Grade), requests that we reconsider our decision in hi-Grade Logging, Inc., b-22223U, b-222231, June 3, 1986, 8b-1 CPD iT , that its bid properly was rejected as late under the PinKy Salvage and kubadub Salvage Timber 6ales conducted by the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. We deny the request for reconsideration. Hi-Grane haiLd-deiivered its bid moments after the bid opening officer declared the 10 a.m. time set for oid opening had arrived and commenced opeiiin6 bids. Hi-Graae aileged that the bin opeuing otficer's declaration of the time was inaccurate, and that its bid was delivered before the time set for bid openiing. We held that ttie bid opening officer's declaration of the bid opening time was determinative of lateness ualess shown to be unreasoilaoie under the circuaistances. We found that the protester failed to make such a showing and therefore its bie properly was rejected as Late. In its reqaest for reconsideration, ai-Grade contends for the first time that, in this case, the Forest Service departed without notice from its established practice or setting the bin openin6 room ciock based oil a telephonic time recording. Hi-Grade asserts that it relied on this practice being followed and alleges tnat the bid openiag room clock was approximately I minute ahead of the time recording. hi-Grade argues that, under these circumstances, the bid opening officer's declaration of bid opening time was unreasonaDle. Our Bid Protest Regulations require that a request for reconsideration contain a detailed statement of the factual and legal grounds for reconsideration, specifying any errors of law or information not previously considered. 4 C.F.R. 21.iz(a) (198b). Inrormation not previously considered means information that was not available to the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most