About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-221675 1 (1986-07-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmjf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                        THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION      .         OF THE UNITED        STATES
                         WASHINGTON. D. C. 2054B




FILE:     B-221675            DATE: July 7, 1986

MATTER OF:       Debra R. Hammond - Relocation Expense
                 Entitlements

DIGEST:
        1. An employee, transferred from Pullman,
            Washington, to Fairbanks, Alaska, was
            authorized to ship a privately owned
            vehicle (POV). The agency disallowed
            the POV claim based on the rationale
            that the employee and her family used
            another POV as their approved mode of
            relocation travel, and thus exhausted
            their rights under 5 U.S.C. S 5727,
            which precludes the shipment of more
            than one POV. On appeal, the claim
            is allowed. Relocation travel and POV
            shipment entitlements are separate and
            distinct statutory rights. The use of
            a POV as an approved mode of travel,
            in lieu of other approved modes of
            travel, is reimbursable on a mileage
            basis under authority of 5 U.S.C.
            S 5724, and such use as a mode of per-
            sonal transportation does not diminish
            the employee's rights under 5 U.S.C.
            S 5727 to ship a different POV when
            travel orders approve such shipment.
            David J. Dossett, B-217691, July 31,
            1985.

        2. A transferred employee reclaims amount
            of disallowed portion of meals and
            miscellaneous expenses incurred while
            occupying temporary quarters. The
            agency denied the claim based on its
            own internal guidelines which provide
            that such expenses up to 49 percent
            of the daily allowable maximum rate of
            per diem are deemed reasonable, but
            any amount in excess of that percent-
            age was to be summarily disallowed
            regardless of unusual circumstances.
            Further agency consideration of the


oc  5- / 303.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most