About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-217215 1 (1986-03-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmfq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




OECISION





FILE: B-217215


THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OP THE UNITED STATES
WASHINQTON, 0. C. 20548



      DATE:   Al , on   104


                                       L1-4.v .; .0
MATTER OF: State of Oklahoma--Liability for Interest on
             Debt


DIGEST:


The State of Oklahoma is liable for interest on
debts owed under the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act where the United States Department
of Education made written demand upon the State
for payment of the debt and advised State that
interest would be charged. The State argued that
it was not liable for interest because the
Department failed to give adequate notice of its
intent to assess interest and had not issued
final regulations governing the collection of
interest. The Department substantially complied
with then-existing notice provisions of the
Federal Claims Collection Standards. In
addition, the Department's failure to publish
final regulations on its policy for assessing
interest does not relieve Oklahoma of its
interest liability because the State had actual
notice of the interest policy.


     The Oklahoma State Department of Education (Oklahoma)
requested our opinion on whether it is liable for interest
demanded by the United States Department of Education (the
Department) on debts owed under titles I and IV of the Elemen-
tary and Secondary Education Act (Act).1/ For the reasons
stated below, we conclude that Oklahoma is liable for the
interest.

                          BACKGROUND

     The Department is demanding interest on two separate
debts. One debt represents an audit disallowance under title
I of the Act of $514,675 which was subsequently sustained by
the Education Appeal Board (EAB). The other debt represents a
title IV audit disallowance of $3,358.90. Oklahoma has paid
the principal amount of both debts. It has also paid the
interest on the title IV debt under protest.


I/ Oklahoma requested our decision with the understanding
    that it would retain, either before or after the issuance
    of our decision, whatever recourse to the courts it would
    otherwise have had. In subsequent correspondence,
    Oklahoma asked us to confirm this understanding. The
    State is correct.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most