About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-217501 1 (1986-03-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadmfh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





OUOISI


FILE:


MATTER C


DIGEST:


                  TECOMPTROLLER GENERAL
ON              oF THE UNITEO STATES
                WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548




B-217501              DATE: March 12, 1986

3F:    Mary Ellen Casco


  An employee received a quality step increase in
  her GS-5 position subsequent to actions denying
  her a promotion to GS-6 for which she success-
  fully brought a discrimination complaint. In
  determining her backpay entitlement incident to
  retroactive promotion to GS-6, the quality step
  increase she earned in the lower grade position
  may not be treated as if it had been awarded in
  the higher grade position to which she was
  retroactively promoted.


     We have been asked to determine the effect of a qual-
ity step increase on the pay of an employee who received
a retroactive promotion pursuant to a discrimination com-
plaint effective prior to the date she received a quality
step increase in her lower grade position. Since the qual-
ity step increase could not have been awarded if she had
been promoted as of the date the discriminatory action took
place, it may not be considered in establishing her rate of
pay in the higher grade position. Amounts she received in
the lower grade position as a result of the quality step
increase are to be set off against the salary of the higher
grade position in determining the amount of her backpay
award.

     Ms. Mary Ellen Casco, while a secretary, grade GS-5,
step 7, in the Denver Regional Office, Office of Fair Hous-
ing and Equal Opportunity, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, received a quality step increase to step 8 of
grade GS-5, effective April 5, 1983. This quality step
increase was predicated upon work she performed after
January 24, 1982, in the secretarial position. However, at
the time she received the quality step increase, Ms. Casco
had filed an equal employment opportunity complaint con-
cerning the selection of another employee to fill a loan
management technician position at grade GS-6. On Septem-
ber 18, 1984, the complaint was decided in Ms. Casco's
favor resulting in her promotion to the grade CS-6 position
and entitlement to backpay for that grade effective Feb-
ruary 6, 1983, the date of the original selection for the
loan management technician position.


_:  / 46

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most