About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-213459.2 1 (1984-11-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlzt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                            THE COMPTROLLER UENNERAL
   OECIION                  OP THE UNITED STATES
                            WAUHINOTON. O.C. 04U



   PILE:      B-213459.2         OATE: November 2, 1984

   MATTUrR OF: Department of the Navy--Request for
                  Reconsideration

   DIGEST:


     Initial GAO decision finding an IFB
     amendment not material based on the *most
     reasonable reading of the IFB is affirmed
     where the agency argues there are other
     reasonable interpretations of the IFB which
     would render the amendment material, but
     those interpretations are not as reasonable
     as the one on which GAO's decision was
     based; where one interpretation of an IFB
     stands out from all others as most reason-
     able, it essentially constitutes the only
     reasonable interpretation for purposes of
     GAO review.

     The Department of the Navy requests reconsideration
of our decision Four Seasons Maintenance, Inc., B-213459,
Mar. 12, 1984, 84-1 CPD   284, sustaining a protest by
Four Seasons that its bid on a Capehart housing renovation
project was improperly rejected as nonresponsive based on
the failure to acknowledge an amendment. We found that
the amendment was not material and that the bid therefore
was responsive. The Navy challenges our conclusions. We
affirm our decision.

     Although the IFB as originally issued did not
explicitly state that the housing would be occupied during
performance, it did state that:

             It is intended that disruption of
     use of facilities to occupants of Capehart
     Housing units will be held to an absolute
     minimum.

The Navy, believing the occupancy requirements unclear,
amended the Invitation for Bids (IFB) to expressly state
that the building will be occupied during the course of
the work. Four Seasons' bid failed to acknowledge this
amendment and was rejected as nonresponsive based on the
Navy's position that the occupancy requirement was
material. We found the amendment not material because, in
our opinion, the most reasonable reading of the quoted

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most