About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-216209 1 (1984-09-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlxp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                            ITHE COMPYRNOLLEN SENERAL
    DECISION               . OP THE UNITED       STATES
                             WAGHINGTON. 0.C. 2054U




    FILE:     B-216209            DATE:    September 24, 1984

    MATTER OF: Department of Army--Request for Advance
                   Decision

    DIGEST:

    1.    Payment of withheld contract funds that are
          claimed by the contractor's payment bond
          surety, which, pursuant to its obligation,
          paid an amount to subcontractors in excess of
          the amount remaining to be paid under the
          contract, may be made to the surety. Con-
          tractor's debts to its subcontractors on a
          different contract do not impact on this
          result because subcontractors do not have
          privity with the government.

     2.   Payment of withheld contract funds should not
          be made except pursuant to an agreement by
          the parties or pursuant to an order by a
          court of competent jurisdiction where con-
          tracting officer failed to insure that a
          valid Miller Act payment bond was furnished
          by the contractor, the contractor has not
          fully paid its subcontractors, and where the
          relative rights of the parties competing for
          the (limited) funds remain unclear.

     By letter dated August 22, 1984, the Chief, Finance and
Accounting Division, Directorate of Resource Management,
Army Corps of Engineers (Army), requested a decision of our
Office in regard to the disbursement of funds withheld under
two contracts, DACA65-82-C-0081 (contract 81) and
DACA65-82-C-0154 (contract 154), between Eastern Building
Services, Inc. (Eastern), and the Army.

                      Contract 81 Funds

     Work under contract 81 was substantially completed, but
Eastern failed to pay all of its creditor-subcontractors.
The Wausau Insurance Company (Wausau) has claimed the
balance to be paid under this contract, $16,188, because
pursuant to its obligations as Eastern's payment bond
surety, it paid out over $30,000 to Eastern's subcon-
tractors. Citing United Electric Corporation v. United
States, 647 F.2d 1082 (Ct. Cl. 1981), cert. denied 454


O  o   ILA

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most