About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-210659 1 (1984-09-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlww0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                             THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
     DECISION                OF THiE    UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON. 0.C. 20548




     FILE: B-210659                DATE: September 5, 19%

     MATTER OF: Lieutenant Colonel John W. Larkin 3d, USAF


     DIGEST:

        The Secretary of the Air Force created a
        10 percent packing allowance in Air Force
        Regulation 75-25 for household goods
        shipped by the direct procurement method
        even though subparagraph M8002-3a, 1 JTR
        prescribes a 20 percent packing allowance
        for househod goods shipped by that
        method. Since the 20 percent packing
        allowance is applicable when the weight
        used to determine the actual weight of the
        household goods is the gross weight of the
        shipment less the weight of the empty
        shipping boxes or transporters, that
        allowance is not for application when the
        weight used is the gross weight of the
        shipment less the weight of the shipping
        boxes or transporters and the weight of
        materials necessary for preparing the
        goods for shipment. In the latter case
        the 10 percent allowance prescribed by the
        Air Force is appropriate.

     The question presented in this case is whether the
Secretary of the Air Force had authority to prescribe a
10 percent packing allowance inoAir Force Regulation (AFR)
75-25, July 9, 1976, for a direct procurement method of
shipment of household goods rather than applying the
20 percent packing allowance for such shipments of household
goods shown in paragraph M8002-3a, Volume 1, Joint Travel
Regulations (JTR). Lieutenant Colonel John W. Larkin, 3d,
USAF, claims reimbursement of charges he paid incident to
the nontemporary storage of an excess weight of household
goods which would not have been considered excess weight had
the 20 percent allowance been used. The Secretaries of the
Services are authorized to supplement the JTR by administra-
tive regulations but they are bound by the specific provi-
sions of those regulations. In the circumstances presented
we find that the Secretary of the Air Force did not exceed
his authority in establishing the 10 percent allowance.
Accordingly, Colonel Larkin's claim is denied.


C~qq4

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most