About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-214905.2 1 (1984-07-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlud0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                            ~4414 'A

                            THE COMPTROLLN U8NENIAL
  OUCISION                 OP THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON       0.0 . 29540




  FILE:        B-214905.2        OATE:  July 10, 1.984
                  International Fidelity-Insurance Co.--
                    Reconsideration


  OIGEST:
     1.   Prior decision is affirmed on reconsideration
          where the protester has not shown any error
          of law or fact which would warrant reversal
          of the decision.

     2.   Payment of withheld contract funds that are
          claimed by payment bond surety, the Depart-
          ment of Labor (DOL) for wage underpayments,
          and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for
          tax indebtedness may be made in the full
          amount of the DOL claim, then of the IRS
          claim, with the remaining balance payable to
          the surety.

     3.   Payment bond surety is not subrogated to the
          rights of unpaid or underpaid laborers.

     4.   The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966 does not
          affect the government's separate remedial
          right of setoff.

     International Fidelity Insurance Co. (Fidelity)
requests that we reconsider our decision in the matter of
Watervliet Arsenal, Department of the Army, B-214905,
May 15, 1984. In that decision, we stated that payment of
withheld contract funds that are claimed by a payment bond
surety, the Department of Labor (DOL) for wage underpay-
ments, and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax
indebtedness may be made in the full amount of the DOL
claim, then of the IRS claim, with the remaining balance
payable to the surety. Fidelity, the surety in this case,
asserts that we have overlooked certain court decisions
which indicate that the surety should get priority over the
DOL and the IRS.

     We affirm our prior decision.

     Fidelity cites the Supreme Court's decision in
Pearlman v. Reliance Insurance Company, 371 U.S. 132,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most