About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-213408.2 1 (1984-06-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlts0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                             THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
    0ECIUION                 OP THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548




    FILE: B-213408.2               OATE:June 28, 1984

    MATTER OF: Orvedahl Construction, Inc.--
                   Reconsideration

    DIGEST:


        Request to withdraw recommendation that
        agency terminate an improperly awarded
        contract is denied where termination costs
        will not be substantial and agency has not
        provided any other reason which would
        justify not terminating the contract.

     The Department of the Air Force (Air Force) requests
that we reconsider the remedial action we recommended in
Orvedahl Construction, Inc., B-213408, April 10, 1984,
84-1 CPD 405.

     We will not withdraw our recommendation.

     Invitation for bids (IFB) No. F32605-83-B072
requested separate bids on five line items to remove and
replace windows at Grand Forks Air Force Base. The IFB
stated that separate awards would be made to the low bidder
on each line item. Orvedahl Construction, Inc. (Orvedahl),
submitted the low bids on line items Nos. 3 and 5. The Air
Force, however, determined that Orvedahl's bid was non-
responsive because it contained a handwritten notation that
Orvedahl would not accept contract awards totaling more than
$1 million. Contracts for both line items were awarded to
Peterson Construction Co. (Peterson), the second low bidder.
We sustained Orvedahl's protest against the rejection of its
bid and we recommended that the Air Force terminate its con-
tract for item 3 with Peterson and award the contract to
Orvedahl.

     The Air Force does not dispute our conclusion that
Orvedahl's bid should not have been rejected as nonrespon-
sive. The Air Force asserts, however, that because termina-
tion costs would be substantial, terminating Peterson's
contract would not be in the best interest of the govern-
ment. The Air Force states that while at the time we made
our recommendation Peterson had not begun to perform the
contract, Peterson did place orders to have special windows
manufactured as required for the contract. The Air Force
states that it will be liable for these windows which are

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most