About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202643 1 (1984-02-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlnc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                           THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL         r
  DECISION                   0 o THE UNITED     *TATEE
                           WASHINGTON. O. C. 20548




  FILE:     B-202643             DATE:    February 7, 1984

  MATTER OF:       Ronald S. Wong - Promotion While Receiving
                   Saved Pay

  DIGEST:
          An employee who exercised his reemployment
          rights and accepted a lower grade, was
          entitled to saved pay under 5 U.S.C.
          S 5337. During saved pay period, he was
          promoted and received a permanent change-
          of-station transfer to a higher cost area
          of the country. Employee claims saved
          pay should have been used for purpose of
          the two step-increase rule on promotion
          to help offset increased cost of living
          in higher cost area. Employee is not so
          entitled as there is no statutory or regu-
          latory basis for such pay setting formula.
          Betty J. Beasley, et al., B-197025,
          August 3, 1981. The provision of 5 U.S.C.
          S 5334(b) which authorizes the two step-
          increase rule on promotion, specifically
          limits its use for pay setting purposes to
          the rate of pay of an employee's grade and
          step as though not entitled to saved pay,
          regardless of circumstances.

     This decision is in response to a letter dated May 26,
1983, from Mr. Ronald S. Wong, an employee of the Department
of the Air Force, requesting further consideration of his
claim for retroactive adjustment of his pay.

     This matter was the subject of settlement by our Claims
Group, Z-2836189, dated November 1, 1982, which disallowed his
claim for the reason that the two step-increase rule on promo-
tions does not apply when saved pay is being received by an
employee, citing to our decision Betty J. Beasley, et al.,
B-197025, August 3, 1981. For the reasons set forth below, we
sustain the denial of Mr. Wong's claim.

     Mr. Wong expresses the view that the only similarity
between Beasley and his case, is that both he and the claim-
ants in Beasley were promoted from a saved pay status. It is
his contention that the additional element in his case and one



                        c-71-7kq2q

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most